4.2 What Is a Business Case?
A business case for an internal consulting role, or
for anything that you wish to have sanctioned by management, is a written
document that clearly delineates the need for what you are seeking and provides
an explanation of the value that can be attained by getting agreement to
proceed. Suppose that you have a pump that is continually failing, causing
interruptions to the manufacturing process and loss of profit. In this
instance, your business case would explain the loss to the company with
specific supporting data. It also would provide a detailed estimate of the cost
of replacement, showing that it was less expensive over the long term to buy a
new pump than to keep repairing the old one.
Another example of the reasoning behind a business
case lies with a group reorganization. For our example, let’s consider
reorganizing from a decentralized maintenance organization to one that is
centralized—all of the mechanics are dispatched from a central scheduling
location rather than being assigned out into the production areas. This is a
major change for an organization. A business case will serve to explain the
reasoning behind the change and the benefits that the change will deliver to
the organization. In this case, the work crews would be assigned to plant-wide
priorities vs. those of the individual production areas, which may not be high
priority across the plant.
The business case for internal consulting is far
more difficult than getting permission to buy a new pump or to reorganize the
department. The reason for this is that most of what an internal consulting
function delivers is either intangible or is a process that enables other
process changes that, in turn, can deliver the bottom-line value that management
usually seeks. However, if you wish to have the internal consulting role
sanctioned and supported, a business case is absolutely required.
Suppose the outcome of an internal consulting
initiative was improved communications between Production and Maintenance. In
this example, the poor communications between the two groups was hampering
reliability of the equipment as well as the effective- ness and efficiency of
both organizations with relation to maintenance repair. Through the consulting
initiative, the root-cause reasons for the poor communication were discovered
and corrected, leading to improvements in both reliability and maintenance
effectiveness.
The value attained through improved communication
between Maintenance and Operations can be measured and built into the business
case for the initiative. However, how do you measure and quantify the value
delivered by having an internal consultant support the work effort? Everyone
recognizes the value of internal consulting, yet it remains an intangible. In
fact, some would say that value was not added at all and the improvement would
have been achieved with or without the internal consultant’s presence.
Therefore, an internal consultantbusiness case is required; otherwise, the
role that the internal consultant plays could easily be overlooked or minimized.
4.3 The Components
A sound business case needs to addresses itself to six
key elements. Some business cases address all of these elements, others just a
few. How many you address depends on what you are trying to justify. The six
elements of a business case are:
• Resource reduction
• Resource re-deployment
• Reduction in external spending
• Revenue enhancement
• Other efficiency and effectiveness gains
• Intangibles
Let’s briefly discuss how you would use the six
element model to justify an internal consulting role within your company.
Resource Reduction
Many companies get into a position where they have
to go through resource reductions. Lost contracts may reduce the need for the
current workforce. The company may face required cutbacks, or even fighting for
the very survival of the plant. Working on a resource reduction initiative can
be extremely difficult for someone who is an integral part of the plant
workforce. I Internal consultants can be used because they understand the big
picture, can be somewhat objective, and are in tune with the needs of the plant
personnel. They can have a positive effect on the work processes and what needs
to be done to keep the work flowing after the change. They can also work with
the organization to help minimize the overall impact on the process and the
people. Those leading the organization are too busy orchestrating the change,
and external consultants are viewed as outsiders. Although resource reduction
occurs infrequently, internal consultants can clearly help minimize the impact.
Resource Re-deployment
Redeployment of resources is much more likely than
a force reduction. In fact, the majority of work process changes involve some
sort of redeployment of the existing resources. Because the internal
consultants are very involved with process changes, they serve a critical role
in resource redeployment as well. Once again, the site leadership is too
involved in the actual day-to-day tasks associated with the change. It is
therefore up to the internal consultants to work closely with the site
personnel to assure that the resources are correctly deployed to support the
change initiative.
Several years ago, I was involved in a work process
redesign which moved the organization from decentralized to centralized
planning and scheduling. As part of this effort, there also was a need to
integrate the maintenance crews who, to this point, had spent years in their
own work areas. These crews seldom if ever communicated with one another. The
original plan was just to bring the crews together into the centralized area,
but still dispatch them without changing the crew mix. As an internal
consultant, I explained the longer-term value of mixing the crews, thereby
allowing the total knowledge of the group to expand. Had I not added this
value, a significant opportunity would have been lost to the organization as
they redeployed.
Reduction in External Spending
Internal consultants can also add value by showing
how improved effectiveness and efficiency of the in-house workforce or in-house
work processes can reduce external spending on contractor support. As work
process initiatives are put into place, those immediately involved often fail
to see that there are new and different ways to perform the work. They also
fail to see that, if these new techniques were put into place, the spending on
contractors and other third-party organizations can be reduced or even
eliminated. This is an area where internal consultants working with the
organization can help them adopt new techniques and reduce their external
spending.
Suppose the maintenance organization has 100 people
performing craft work within the plant at an effectiveness rate of 40%. Also
suppose that due to the workload the same plant has a contractor workforce
staffed to augment the in-house organization. If you, as an internal consultant
working with the site personnel, are able to improve effectiveness by 10%, you
will help the plant raise productivity by 80 hours per day, 400 hours per week,
or approximately 2000 hours per year. With this increased productivity, you
would be able to reduce the contractor workforce by 250 mandays per year—a
significant reduction in external spending.
Revenue Enhancement –
Internal consultants can help improve the revenue
of a plant. For example, take any of the reliability initiatives in which an
internal consultant can become involved. When successfully delivered, each of
these will increase the reliability of the equipment, thereby enabling the
plant to meet the demands of the marketplace better. Think about plants that
operate 24 hours per day, seven days per week. These plants typically do not
have the ability to make up for lost production as a result of equipment
failure. Hence, unplanned shutdowns cost money. By supporting improved reliability
initiatives, internal consultants support a site’s ability to enhance its
revenue stream.
Other Efficiency and Effectiveness Gains
The work of internal consultants has the ability to
deliver intangible benefits centered in the area of soft skills, also known as
the eight elements of change. These elements—leadership, work process,
structure, group learning, technology, communications, interrelationships, and
rewards—are all key components of inter- nal consulting initiatives. Yet they
are almost impossible to quantify as you can with the first four components of
the internal consultantbusiness case. Nevertheless, they are of critical
importance. Positive changes in any or all of them will deliver immense benefit
to the organization. These are the elements we will discuss in the next
chapter. They also have been discussed in my other two books:
Successfully Managing
Change in Organizations: A Users Guide
and
Improving Maintenance & Reliability Through
Culture Change.
Intangibles
As you will learn in Chapter 5, there is another
component of the change process that, along with soft skills, is often
overlooked in the development and deployment of change initiatives. This
component is the organization’s culture, made up of four elements— organizational
values, role models, rites and rituals, and the organization’s infrastructure.
The organization’s culture is an intangible component of every change
initiative. As an internal consultant, you can make sure that the culture and
the related impact on the culture from any change initiative are addressed and
not allowed to undermine the effort.