The Properties of Tool Steels.—
Tool steels must possess certain properties to
a higher than ordinary degree to make them adaptable for uses that require the
ability to sustain heavy loads and perform dependably even under adverse
conditions.
The
extent and the types of loads, the characteristics of the operating conditions,
and the expected performance with regard to both the duration and the level of
consistency are the principal considerations, in combination with the aspects
of cost, that govern the selection of tool steels for specific applications.
Although
it is not possible to define and apply exact parameters for measuring
significant tool steel characteristics, certain properties can be determined
that may greatly assist in appraising the suitability of various types of tool
steels for specific uses.
Because
tool steels are generally heat-treated to make them adaptable to the intended
use by enhancing the desirable properties,
the behavior of the steel during heat treatment
is of prime importance. The behavior of the
steel comprises, in this respect, both the resistance to harmful effects and
the attainment of the desirable properties. The following are considered the
major properties related to heat treatment:
Safety in Hardening:
This
designation expresses the ability of the steel to withstand the harmful effects
of exposure to very high heat and particularly to the sudden temperature changes
during quenching, without harmful effects. One way of obtaining this property
is by adding alloying elements to reduce the critical speed at which quenching
must be carried out, thus permitting the use of milder quenching media such as
oil, salt, or just still air.
The most common harm parts made of tool steel suffer from during
heat treatment is the development of cracks. In addition to the composition of
the steel and the applied heat-treating process, the configuration of the part
can also affect the sensitivity to cracking. The preceding figure illustrates a
few design characteristics related to cracking and warpage in heat treatment; the
observation of these design tips, which call for generous filleting, avoidance
of sharp angles, and major changes without transition in the cross-section, is
particularly advisable when using tool steel types with a low index value for
safety in hardening.
In current practice, the previously mentioned property of tool
steels is rated in the order of decreasing safety (i.e., increasing
sensitivity) as Highest, Very High, High, Medium, and Low safety, expressed in
Tables 6
through
11
by the letters A, B, C, D, and E.
Distortions in Heat Treating:
In parts made from tool steels,
distortions are often a consequence of inadequate design (See Fig. 1.) or
improper heat treatment (e.g., lack of stress relieving). However, certain
types of tool steels display different degrees of sensitivity to distortion.
Steels that are less stable require safer design of the parts for which they
are used, more careful heat treatment, including the proper support for long
and slender parts, or thin sections, and possibly greater grinding allowance to
permit subsequent correction of the distorted shape. Some parts made of a type
of steel generally sensitive to distortions can be heat-treated with very
little damage when the requirements of the part call for a relatively shallow
hardened layer over a soft core. However, for intricate shapes and large tools,
steel types should be selected that possess superior nondeforming properties.
The ratings used in
Tables 6
through
11
express the
nondeforming properties (stability of shape in heat treatment) of the steel
types and start with the lowest distortion (the best stability) designated as
A; the greatest susceptibility to distortion is designated as E.
Depth of Hardening:
Hardening depth is indicated by a
relative rating based on how deep the phase transformation penetrates from the
surface and thus produces a hardened layer. Because of the effect of the
heat-treating process, and particularly of the applied quenching medium, on the
depth of hardness, reference is made in
Tables 6
through
11
to the quench that
results in the listed relative hardenability values. These values are
designated by letters A, B, and C, expressing deep, medium, and shallow depth,
respectively.
Resistance to Decarburization:
Higher or lower sensitivity to
losing a part of the carbon content of the surface exposed to heat depends on
the chemistry of the steel. The sensitivity can be balanced partially by
appropriate heat-treating equipment and processes. Also, the amount of material
to be removed from the surface after heat treatment, usually by grinding, should
be specified in such a manner as to avoid the retention of a decarburized layer
on functional surfaces. The relative resistance of individual tool steel types
to decarburization during heat treatment is rated in
Tables 6
through
11
from High to Low, expressed by the
letters A, B, and C.
Tool steels must be workable with generally available means,
without requiring highly specialized processes. The tools made from these
steels must, of course, perform adequately, often under adverse environmental
and burdensome operational conditions. The ability of the individual types of
tool steels to satisfy, to different degrees, such applicational requirements
can also be appraised on the basis of significant properties, such as the following.
Machinability:
Tools are precision products whose final shape and
dimensions must be produced by machining, a process to which not all tool steel
types lend themselves equally well. The difference in machinability is
particularly evident in tool steels that, depending on their chemical
composition, may contain substantial amounts of metallic carbides, beneficial to
increased wear resistance, yet detrimental to the service life of tools with
which the steel has to be worked. The microstructure of the steel type can also
affect the ease of machining and, in some types, certain phase conditions, such
as those due to low carbon content, may cause difficulties in achieving a fine
surface finish. Certain types of tool steels have their machinability improved
by the addition of small amounts of sulfur or lead.
Machinability affects the cost of making the tool, particularly
for intricate tool shapes, and must be considered in selection of the steel to
be used. The ratings in
Tables 6
through
11
, starting with A for the greatest
ease of machining to E for the lowest machinability, refer to working of the
steel in an unhardened condition. Machinability is not necessarily identical
with grindability, which expresses how well the steel is adapted to grinding
after heat treating. The ease of grinding, however, may become an important
consideration in tool steel selection, particularly for cutting tools and dies,
which require regular sharpening involving extensive grinding. AVCO Bay State
Abrasives Company compiled information on the relative grindability of
frequently used types of tool steels. A simplified version of that information
is presented in
Table 1
,
which assigns the listed tool steel types to one of the following grindability
grades: High (A), Medium (B), Low (C), and Very Low (D), expressing decreasing
ratios of volume of metal removed to wheel wear.
Hot Hardness:
This property designates the steel’s resistance to the
softening effect of
elevated temperature. This characteristic is related to the
tempering temperature of the
type of steel, which is controlled by various alloying elements
such as tungsten, molybdenum,
vanadium, cobalt, and chromium.
Hot hardness is a necessary property of tools used for hot work,
like forging, casting, and hot extrusion. Hot hardness is also important in
cutting tools operated at high-speed, which generate sufficient heat to raise
their temperature well above the level where ordinary steels lose their
hardness; hence the designation
high-speed steels
, which refers to a family of tool steels developed for use at
high cutting speeds. Frequently it is the degree of the tool steel’s resistance
to softening at elevated temperature that governs important process data, such
as the applicable cutting speed. In the ratings of
Tables 6
through
11
, tool steel types having the
highest hot hardness are marked with A, subsequent letters expressing gradually
decreasing capacity to endure elevated temperature without losing hardness.
Wear Resistance:
The gradual erosion of the tool’s operating surface,
most conspicuously occurring at the exposed edges, is known as wear. Resistance
to wear prolongs the useful life of the tool by delaying the degradation of its
surface through abrasive contact with the work at regular operating
temperatures; these temperatures vary according to the type of process. Wear
resistance is observable experimentally and measurable by comparison. Certain
types of metallic carbides embedded into the steel matrix are considered to be the
prime contributing factors to wear resistance, besides the hardness of the
heat-treated steel material. The ratings of
Tables 6
through
11
, starting with A for the best to E
for poor, are based on conditions thought to be normal in operations for which
various types of tool materials are primarily used.
Toughness:
In tool steels, this property expresses ability to sustain shocks,
suddenly applied and relieved loads, or major impacts, without breaking. Steels
used for making tools must also be able to absorb such forces with only a
minimum of elasticdeformation and without permanent deformation to any extent
that would interfere with the proper functioning of the tool. Certain types of
tool steels, particularly those with high carbon content and without the
presence of beneficial alloying constituents, tend to be the most sensitive to
shocks, although they can also be made to act tougher when used for tools that permit
a hardened case to be supported by a soft core. Tempering improves toughness, while
generally reducing hardness. The rating indexes in
Tables 6
through
11
, A for the highest toughness
through E for the types most sensitive to shocks, apply to tools heat treated
to hardness values normally used for the particular type of tool steel.
Copyright 2004, Industrial
Press, Inc., New York, NY